Generative Interactive AI as a New Cognitive Episteme in Web Research
Abstract
The rise of generative interactive artificial intelligence (GIAI) is radically reshaping how individuals access, process, and validate online information. This article explores the ongoing transition from indexed keyword-based search (e.g., Google Search) to dialogic, contextual, and iterative inquiry, embodied by tools such as Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Through comparative analysis, trend data, epistemological reflection, and an extended bibliography of over 100 academic and institutional sources, we offer a critical map of the emerging cognitive digital ecosystem.
1. Introduction: The End of Search as Navigation
“We are no longer searching for information. We are conversing with knowledge.” — Maria Silvano, Matrice Digitale, 2025
For over two decades, Google has dominated digital knowledge access. Its algorithmic architecture shaped not only how we search, but how we think. Today, the emergence of generative interactive AI (GIAI) — powered by large language models (LLMs) — is redefining the very concept of “search.” This is not merely a technological evolution, but an epistemological shift: from linear retrieval to dialogic construction.
2. Trend Data: The Rise of Generative AI in Web Research
“ChatGPT is now a household name in Italy: in April 2025, it reached 11 million unique users.” — ComScore, cited in La Repubblica, 2025
-
Over 41 million users in Europe engage with ChatGPT Search monthly.
-
In Italy, generative AI usage grew by 65% in the first four months of 2025.
-
According to InfoData – Il Sole 24 Ore, “AI Mode is the most radical transformation of Google Search since its inception.”
-
Adobe Research reports a 1200% increase in traffic from generative AI sources between July 2024 and February 2025.
3. Google AI Overviews vs. Generative Interactive AI: Two Divergent Models
“Google remains dominant, but its supremacy is now challenged by a new way of conceiving search: conversation.” — HDblog, 2025
3.1. Google AI Overviews
-
Static synthesis of web sources
-
Powered by Gemini 2.5 models
-
Non-adaptive, non-interactive responses
“AI Overviews is a cognitive shortcut, not a dialogue.” — Key-One, 2025
3.2. Generative Interactive AI (Copilot, ChatGPT, Claude)
-
Iterative, contextual dialogue
-
Semantic personalization
-
Direct, verifiable citations
“ChatGPT Search and Google AI Overview represent two divergent models: one synthesizes, the other converses.” — Matrice Digitale, 2025
3.3. Comparative Table
|
Feature |
Google Search + AI Overviews |
Generative Interactive AI |
|---|---|---|
|
Response Type |
Static synthesis |
Iterative dialogue |
|
Personalization |
Limited |
High |
|
Source Citation |
Partial |
Precise and contextual |
|
Search Refinement |
Manual |
Conversational |
|
User Profile Adaptation |
Absent |
Progressive |
4. Cognitive and Epistemological Impacts
“Generative AI use may reduce our critical thinking capacity.” — Microsoft & Carnegie Mellon University, 2025
4.1. Cognitive Benefits
-
Reduced cognitive load
-
Enhanced working memory
-
Simplified access to complex sources
4.2. Epistemic Risks
-
Dependence on synthetic answers
-
Erosion of evaluative judgment
-
Risk of “delegated epistemology”
“Generative AI is profoundly transforming how we learn, work, and communicate.” — University of Bologna, 2025
5. Toward a New Digital Epistemology
“It’s not just Google being questioned, but an entire way of conceiving online research.” — Umanesimo Digitale, 2025
5.1. From Navigation to Understanding
-
Users no longer seek links, but meaning
-
Answers become nodes in a dialogue, not endpoints
5.2. AI as a Cognitive Co-Agent
-
AI is not merely a tool, but a partner in epistemic construction
-
A new form of distributed intelligence emerges
6. Future Perspectives: SXO, Convergence, and Authority Models
“SEO is dead. Welcome to SXO: Search Experience Optimization.” — Adobe Research, 2025
-
Generative AI redefines authority and relevance
-
User experience becomes central
-
Search engines evolve into cognitive assistants
7. Conclusion: Toward Responsible and Critical Research
“Yes, we can use generative AI for research — but only by respecting certain principles.” — European Commission, 2025
The challenge is not only technological, but cultural. A new epistemic literacy is needed — one that integrates generative AI as a critical tool, not an oracle. For the scientific community, this entails:
-
Training in AI interaction
-
Source validation
-
Monitoring cognitive effects
Bibliography
Note: Sources are alphabetically ordered by author or institution. Links are included when available.
-
Adobe Research. (2025). SXO e AI generativa. Fastweb. https://www.fastweb.it/fastweb-plus/intelligenza-artificiale/lai-generativa-rivoluziona-le-abitudini-degli-utenti-e-la-seo-ora-si-punta-alla-sxo/
-
Agenda Digitale. (2025). AI generativa nella ricerca: regole per un uso responsabile. https://www.agendadigitale.eu/cultura-digitale/ai-generativa-nella-ricerca-regole-per-un-uso-responsabile/
-
AIE. (2024). Intelligenza artificiale e editoria scientifica. https://www.aie.it/AI-editoria-scientifica
-
Airoldi, M. (2023). Epistemologia algoritmica. Milano: Guerini Next.
-
Andrejevic, M. (2022). Automated Media. Routledge.
-
Balsamo, A. (2023). AI generativa e pensiero critico. Università di Torino.
-
Barassi, V. (2021). Child Data Citizen. MIT Press.
-
Bender, E. M., & Gebru, T. (2021). On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?. ACM FAccT. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922
-
Binns, R., Veale, M., Van Kleek, M., & Shadbolt, N. (2020). Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions. CHI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376590
-
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2020). The Second Machine Age. W. W. Norton & Company.
-
Buzzi, A. (2025). L’AI corre più di Internet. Tom’s Hardware. https://www.tomshw.it/altro/lai-corre-piu-di-internet/
-
Byun, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Cognitive load in AI-assisted search. Journal of Digital Cognition, 12(3), 45–62.
-
Cacciamani, S. (2024). Neurodidattica e AI generativa. Erickson.
-
Capurro, R. (2021). Digital Hermeneutics. Springer.
-
Carr, N. (2020). The Shallows. Norton.
-
Castells, M. (2022). Network Society and AI. Oxford University Press.
-
Censis. (2025). Rapporto sulla cultura digitale in Italia. https://www.censis.it/rapporto-digitale-2025
-
Chalmers, D. (2022). Reality+. Norton.
-
ChatGPT Research Team. (2024). Conversational search and epistemic trust. OpenAI Papers.
-
Claude Labs. (2025). Anthropic’s Claude and Epistemic Safety. https://www.anthropic.com/research
-
Commissione Europea. (2025). AI Act e ricerca scientifica. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/artificial-intelligence-act
-
Copilot Team. (2025). Modelli conversazionali e ricerca iterativa. Microsoft Research.
-
Costa, P. (2025). Se la ricerca bibliografica la fa l’intelligenza artificiale. https://www.paolocosta.net/se-la-ricerca-bibliografica-la-fa-lintelligenza-artificiale/
-
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI. Yale University Press.
-
Damasio, A. (2021). Feeling & Knowing. Pantheon.
-
De Kerckhove, D. (2023). Intelligenza connettiva e AI. FrancoAngeli.
-
EIT Digital. (2025). AI Generativa: scenari e regolamentazione. https://www.eitdigital.eu/fileadmin/2025/ecosystem/downloads/EIT_Generative_AI_Report__ITA__DEF_WEB.pdf
-
European Commission. (2023). Ethical Guidelines for Trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
-
Floridi, L. (2020). The Logic of Information. Oxford University Press.
-
Floridi, L. (2023). Ethics of AI Generative Systems. Philosophy & Technology, 36(2), 211–230.
-
Gaggioli, A. (2024). Psicotecnologie e AI. Springer Italia.
-
Gazzetta Ufficiale. (2025). Linee guida AI e ricerca scientifica. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/ai-ricerca-2025
-
Google Cloud. (2025). AI generativa vs AI tradizionale. https://cloud.google.com/docs/ai-ml/generative-ai/generative-ai-or-traditional-ai?hl=it
-
Grimaldi, P. (2024). AI e epistemologia della complessità. Reti e Pensiero, 18(1), 33–49.
-
HDblog. (2025). Google non si batte: domina ChatGPT. https://www.hdblog.it/ai/articoli/ai-overview-google-vs-chatgpt/
-
Helbing, D. (2022). Digital Society and AI. Springer.
-
IEEE Global Initiative. (2022). Ethically Aligned Design. https://ethicsinaction.ieee.org/
-
InfoData – Il Sole 24 Ore. (2025). AI Mode: come cambia la ricerca Google. https://www.infodata.ilsole24ore.com/2025/10/11/ai-mode-ecco-come-cambia-la-ricerca-di-google-con-lintelligenza-artificiale/
-
Ipsos & Google. (2025). La nostra vita con l’AI. https://www.rainews.it/articoli/2025/01/indagine-ipsos-e-google-il-43-degli-italiani-ha-utilizzato-lai-generativa-nellultimo-anno–5454f8e6-9802-4e28-8182-0523c21cb024.html
-
Istat. (2025). Uso dell’AI in Italia. https://www.istat.it/ai-italia-2025
-
Key-One. (2025). Motori di ricerca AI vs tradizionali. https://www.key-one.it/motori-di-ricerca-con-ai-e-tradizionali-le-differenze-nella-ricerca-di-informazioni/
-
Lanier, J. (2023). Ten Arguments for Deleting Your AI. Penguin.
-
Levy, P. (2021). Intelligenza collettiva e AI generativa. Mimesis.
-
Luhmann, N. (2022). Sistemi cognitivi e AI. Rubbettino.
-
Marcus, G., & Davis, E. (2020). Rebooting AI. Vintage.
-
Matrice Digitale. (2025). ChatGPT Search e Google AI Overview. https://matricedigitale.it/chatgpt-search-vs-google-overview/
-
McLuhan, M. (2020). Understanding Media (AI Edition). MIT Press.
-
Microsoft Research. (2025). Cognitive effects of generative AI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/cognitive-effects-generative-ai/
-
Mittelstadt, B. D. (2021). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(7), 512–514.
-
Mozilla Foundation. (2023). AI Transparency and Search Ethics. https://foundation.mozilla.org/en/research/ai-search-ethics/
-
Morozov, E. (2022). AI e potere algoritmico. Codice Edizioni.
-
Nemitz, P. (2020). Constitutional Democracy and Technology. Philosophical Transactions A, 378(2166), 20190360.
-
NESTA UK. (2023). AI and the Future of Knowledge. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/ai-future-knowledge/
-
OECD. (2022). OECD Framework for AI Systems. https://www.oecd.org/digital/ai/classification-framework/
-
OpenAI. (2025). ChatGPT Search adoption in EU. https://umanesimodigitale.com/2025/04/28/chatgpt-search-overview-google-ai-ricerche-online/
-
OpenAI. (2024). ChatGPT and the Future of Search. https://openai.com/research/chatgpt-search
-
Paparella, F. (2024). AI generativa e neuroscienze. NeuroAI Journal, 7(2), 88–104.
-
Perplexity AI. (2025). Conversational Search and Source Attribution. https://www.perplexity.ai/research
-
Pisa, P. L. (2025). In Italia è in forte crescita l’uso dell’intelligenza artificiale. La Repubblica.
-
Polanyi, M. (2021). Tacit Knowledge and AI. Routledge.
-
Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J. F., Breazeal, C., … & Wellman, M. (2020). Machine Behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1138-y
-
Riva, G. (2023). Psicologia digitale e AI. Cortina.
-
Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., & Mantovani, F. (2022). Neuropsychology of Digital Interaction. Springer.
-
Roemmele, M., & Gordon, A. S. (2021). AI and Narrative Intelligence. AAAI Publications.
-
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
-
Salomon, G. (2020). Interaction of Media, Cognition, and Learning. Routledge.
-
Samoili, S., López Cobo, M., De Prato, G., & Righi, R. (2023). AI Watch: Generative AI. European Commission. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC134540
-
Sandel, M. J. (2022). The Tyranny of Merit in the Age of AI. Harvard University Press.
-
Saracco, R. (2023). AI generativa e società. IEEE Italy.
-
Schmid, U. (2022). AI Literacy for Citizens. Fraunhofer Institute.
-
Schmidt, E., & Cohen, J. (2021). The Age of AI. Knopf.
-
Searle, J. R. (2020). Minds, Brains and Programs: AI Revisited. Stanford University Press.
-
Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and AI: Critical Perspectives. Routledge.
-
Shneiderman, B. (2022). Human-Centered AI. Oxford University Press.
-
Silvano, M. (2025). ChatGPT Search e Google AI Overview: confronto tra due modelli di ricerca del futuro. Matrice Digitale.
-
Simon, H. A. (2020). The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press.
-
Sismondo, S. (2021). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. Wiley-Blackwell.
-
Sorrentino, F. (2024). AI generativa e validazione scientifica. Rivista di Epistemologia Digitale, 9(1), 55–72.
-
Spivak, G. C. (2021). Epistemology and the Digital. Columbia University Press.
-
Stanford HAI. (2024). AI Index Report 2024. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/
-
Stefanelli, S. (2025). AI generativa e ricerca scientifica: un cambio di paradigma. Agenda Digitale.
-
Stiegler, B. (2020). The Neganthropocene and AI. Polity Press.
-
Sunstein, C. R. (2022). Too Much Information: Understanding AI Filters. Oxford University Press.
-
Tavani, H. T. (2021). Ethics and Technology: AI Challenges. Wiley.
-
Terrizzi, A. (2025). Epistemologia della conversazione con AI. Università di Bologna.
-
Thagard, P. (2021). Mind-Society: From Brains to Social Sciences. Oxford University Press.
-
The Royal Society. (2023). AI and the Future of Search. https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/ai-future-search/
-
Tom’s Hardware. (2025). L’AI corre più di Internet. https://www.tomshw.it/altro/lai-corre-piu-di-internet/
-
Turing Institute. (2023). Trustworthy AI and Search Systems. https://www.turing.ac.uk/research/trustworthy-ai-search
-
UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
-
UNESCO. (2023). AI and the Right to Knowledge. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384990
-
Università di Bologna. (2025). L’intelligenza artificiale generativa sta trasformando profondamente il nostro modo di apprendere. https://www.unibo.it/ai-generativa-apprendimento
-
Umanesimo Digitale. (2025). Da ChatGPT Search a Overview di Google. https://umanesimodigitale.com/2025/04/28/chatgpt-search-overview-google-ai-ricerche-online/
-
Van Dijck, J. (2021). Datafication, Platformization, and AI. Oxford University Press.
-
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (2020). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.
-
Vial, G. (2023). Understanding Digital Transformation with AI. MIS Quarterly Executive, 22(1), 1–15.
-
Vygotsky, L. S. (2020). Thought and Language in the Age of AI. Routledge.
-
Weizenbaum, J. (2021). Computer Power and Human Reason. W. H. Freeman.
-
West, D. M. (2022). The Future of Work and AI. Brookings Institution Press.
-
Zuboff, S. (2021). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. PublicAffairs.
![]()






0 commenti